<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Maps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/</link>
	<description> Routable Maps for Garmin GPS for outdoor sports </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>On next map update (I probabely update Austria tonight), you can see new design. I took over yellow streets as most maps seem to use yellow, and background will be allways white from now on whithout performance hit. I don&#039;t like wide roads at all. Personaly I would display all roads only 2 pixel wide. What I changed is that I also use a &quot;point cloud&quot; for mtb routes / cycle routes now. That is indeed much better for identification.
Without white background on etrex / gpsmaps GPS using yellow streets is a nogo, cause you can&#039;t see them very well against background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On next map update (I probabely update Austria tonight), you can see new design. I took over yellow streets as most maps seem to use yellow, and background will be allways white from now on whithout performance hit. I don&#8217;t like wide roads at all. Personaly I would display all roads only 2 pixel wide. What I changed is that I also use a &#8220;point cloud&#8221; for mtb routes / cycle routes now. That is indeed much better for identification.<br />
Without white background on etrex / gpsmaps GPS using yellow streets is a nogo, cause you can&#8217;t see them very well against background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>last comment about this not deleted without notice. Please read the FAQ and the Tutorials!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last comment about this not deleted without notice. Please read the FAQ and the Tutorials!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jinx71</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jinx71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>Hi extremecarver,
first of all: GREAT WORK !!

second: the new italymap (2009.06.10) seems not to work with my Garmin Edge705, while everything was ok for the previous ones (2009.06.04 and on). In details: uploading to my gps (with mapsource - as usual) my Edge now DOESN&#039;T SEE THE WAYS (??).
maybe the problem could be in the routing features: in fact in Mapsource - with the new map installed and selected in map tools for uploading - the &quot;check&quot; button for &quot;include route data ...&quot; is in blank mode (not selecteble).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi extremecarver,<br />
first of all: GREAT WORK !!</p>
<p>second: the new italymap (2009.06.10) seems not to work with my Garmin Edge705, while everything was ok for the previous ones (2009.06.04 and on). In details: uploading to my gps (with mapsource &#8211; as usual) my Edge now DOESN&#8217;T SEE THE WAYS (??).<br />
maybe the problem could be in the routing features: in fact in Mapsource &#8211; with the new map installed and selected in map tools for uploading &#8211; the &#8220;check&#8221; button for &#8220;include route data &#8230;&#8221; is in blank mode (not selecteble).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>You can turn it off in the typfile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can turn it off in the typfile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ligfietser</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>ligfietser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Its just on my etrex, not on Mapsource. In fact all streetnames are displayed in Capital letters but thats default. When i zoom out some roads still show your osm features, like bridge, tunnel, secondary or oneway. Dont know how to turn them off (showing streetnames at a certain zoomlevel doesnt help).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just on my etrex, not on Mapsource. In fact all streetnames are displayed in Capital letters but thats default. When i zoom out some roads still show your osm features, like bridge, tunnel, secondary or oneway. Dont know how to turn them off (showing streetnames at a certain zoomlevel doesnt help).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>Ups, will change in Typfile. Should have been switched of. Interesting, have you seen any other places with Capital letters? I though capital letters don&#039;t work at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ups, will change in Typfile. Should have been switched of. Interesting, have you seen any other places with Capital letters? I though capital letters don&#8217;t work at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ligfietser</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>ligfietser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Thanks,
I use a Garmin Etrex Venture, I understand the problem that there are a limited number of lines you can use in mapsource/garmin to display all features from the OSM map.

One last remark: one way streets are shown on my etrex screen in big capital letters ONEWAY which is very distracting and too striking. Besides, you use already an arrow to indicate the direction (those arrows are too big in my opinion, in the typ file i edited i made them thinner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,<br />
I use a Garmin Etrex Venture, I understand the problem that there are a limited number of lines you can use in mapsource/garmin to display all features from the OSM map.</p>
<p>One last remark: one way streets are shown on my etrex screen in big capital letters ONEWAY which is very distracting and too striking. Besides, you use already an arrow to indicate the direction (those arrows are too big in my opinion, in the typ file i edited i made them thinner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t see in Mapsource when a route is calculated what kind of route it is otherwise because the routing line blocks the whole road view (okay you can see cycleroutes and mtbroutes shimmering through - but that is it)! Also there are no free types for lines to differentiate between everything using 0x07 currently.
I&#039;ll have a look at your typfile. However I&#039;ld rather go thinner lines than wider, because etrex/gpsmaps/edge Garmin units have few pixels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t see in Mapsource when a route is calculated what kind of route it is otherwise because the routing line blocks the whole road view (okay you can see cycleroutes and mtbroutes shimmering through &#8211; but that is it)! Also there are no free types for lines to differentiate between everything using 0&#215;07 currently.<br />
I&#8217;ll have a look at your typfile. However I&#8217;ld rather go thinner lines than wider, because etrex/gpsmaps/edge Garmin units have few pixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ligfietser</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>ligfietser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I see you are using now abbreviations, which is better. But I still dont see any reason to use the OSM categories on the maps, too much information doesn&#039;t make the maps look good. Besides, you are using different colours and line widths already to distinguish those categories, which is to my opinion good enough. Maybe restyling the colours / widths in the TYP file would improve the maps more. I have edited the TYP file, maybe for those who are interested can have a look at them at http://moh.freehostia.com/temp/openmtb.TYP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I see you are using now abbreviations, which is better. But I still dont see any reason to use the OSM categories on the maps, too much information doesn&#8217;t make the maps look good. Besides, you are using different colours and line widths already to distinguish those categories, which is to my opinion good enough. Maybe restyling the colours / widths in the TYP file would improve the maps more. I have edited the TYP file, maybe for those who are interested can have a look at them at <a href="http://moh.freehostia.com/temp/openmtb.TYP" rel="nofollow">http://moh.freehostia.com/temp/openmtb.TYP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: extremecarver</title>
		<link>http://openmtbmap.org/uncategorized/maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>extremecarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openmtbmap.org/?p=612#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>No its a feature. But it will be changed for better with the next update. The main reason is, that in Mapsource you can&#039;t easily see what kind of road type is underlying (only cutting out the route), if an abbreviation for the street type is included in the name, on a calculated route it is easy to grasp what kind of roads the route is following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No its a feature. But it will be changed for better with the next update. The main reason is, that in Mapsource you can&#8217;t easily see what kind of road type is underlying (only cutting out the route), if an abbreviation for the street type is included in the name, on a calculated route it is easy to grasp what kind of roads the route is following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Quick Cache: failed to write cache. The cache/ directory is either non-existent ( and could not be created ) or it is not writable. -->
