<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Just a collection of screenshots from Basecamp and Mapsource to give you an image on how the map looks like on your desktop. (note while you can choose to use the same layout on your GPS, it is recommended to use one of the 3 GPS layouts with higher contrast as they are easier to read with bad light conditions):<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Note that the OpenMTBMap is a vector map that is drawn realtime on your PC\/GPS. While raster maps are handdrawn and you would need one map for every resolution, vector maps are drawn realtime by your GPS\/PC. This means that things like labels or density of streets\/ways may be too much or too low. On the other hand vector maps are fully scalable, freely zoomable, rotatable (without letters being drawn upsidedown), autorouting capable, searchable, ....\u00a0 But hey, as you can see on the screenshots, the rendering quality is not far off from raster maps!<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx1.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx2.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx3.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx4.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx5.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx6.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx7.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx8.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx9.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx9.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Following is a series of zooming into Germany Hamburg (1. shot: detail resolution from infinite to 70km)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx10.png\")
<\/p>\n
(50-20km)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx11.png\")
<\/p>\n
(15-10km)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx12.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(7-5km)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx13.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(3-2km resolution)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx14.png\")
<\/p>\n
(1.5-1km resolution)<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx15.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Note the following screenshot highlight too much information shown (the labels are not wisely chosen and interfere a bit) (700-300m resolution). But hey, on the zooming in phase this is basically the only one that is suboptimal.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx16.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
This is the highest detail level (200m to 20m resolution). Note you can still zoom in closer without quality degradation of course. Only there is no more additional information showing up.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/legend\/screenx17.png\")
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Einfach ein paar Screenshots der OpenMTBMap aus Basecamp und Mapsource um zu zeigen wie die Karte aussschaut am Desktop. (am GPS kann man zwar dasselbe Layout w\u00e4hlen, aber es macht mehr Sinn ein hochkontrastlayout im Installer auszuw\u00e4hlen, um bei schlechten Lichtbedingungen schnell und sicher die Karte zu erkennen).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Vergleichen muss man dies mit anderen Vektorkarten. Nicht Rasterkarten. Vektorkarten werden aus den Daten realtime am GPS\/PC gerendert, und daher sind gewisse Details wie etwa die Dichte von Labels und Beschriftungen nie so optimal wie bei einer handgezeichneten Rasterkarte. Daf\u00fcr ist die Karte drehbar, frei zoombar, und routingf\u00e4hig auf allen Wegen. Hey und ich finde die \u00dcbersicht ist schon sehr sehr nah an einer Rasterkarte.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Folgend eine Serie von Screenshots die alle Detaillevel der Deutschlandkarte zeigen - beim hereinzoomen nach Hamburg (1. shot: Detaillevel von unendlich bis 70km)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(50-20km)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(15-10km)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(7-5km)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(3-2km resolution)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
(1.5-1km resolution)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Diese Detailstufe ist bei Gro\u00dfst\u00e4dten leider etwas \u00fcberfrachtet (700-300m resolution) - vor allem da zu viele Labels platziert sind. Aber hey, es ist im Prinzip die einzige Detailstufe die wirklich verbesserungsw\u00fcrdig ist.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Dies ist die h\u00f6chste Detailstufe (200m to 20m resolution). Man kann weiter beliebig weit hereinzoomen ohne Qualit\u00e4tsverlust. Allerdings erscheinen keine \"neuen\" Informationen\/Details mehr.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n
Bitte sieh auch hier – hier gibt es Beispiele zu den verschiedenen Layouts der VeloMap (und OpenMTBMap):<\/p>\n
Karten Legende und Layouts<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Just a collection of screenshots from Basecamp and Mapsource to give you an image on how the map looks like on your desktop. (note while you can choose to use the same layout on your GPS, it is recommended to use one of the 3 GPS layouts with higher contrast as they are easier to read with bad light conditions):<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Note that the OpenMTBMap is a vector map that is drawn realtime on your PC\/GPS. While raster maps are handdrawn and you would need one map for every resolution, vector maps are drawn realtime by your GPS\/PC. This means that things like labels or density of streets\/ways may be too much or too low. On the other hand vector maps are fully scalable, freely zoomable, rotatable (without letters being drawn upsidedown), autorouting capable, searchable, …. But hey, as you can see on the screenshots, the rendering quality is not far off from raster maps!<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
[…]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":30,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-33","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/33\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/30"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/openmtbmap.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}