Legenda Mappa

 

Polilinee (Highways):

Spiegazione: Ci sono in totale 4 modelli di visualizzazione. Tuttavia le colorazioni sono sempre le stesse per "thin""wide" and "clas". Si differenziano solamente per lo spessore delle linee per adattarsi al meglio ai differenti GPS. Il layout mapsource/Qlandkarte GT  (d'ora in avanti "trad") invece ha colori differenti, con meno contrasto. Di conseguenza in questa legenda per le polilinee (Strade) ci sono sempre 2 esempi. Uno che utilizza il layout "trad" (in alto), e uno usando il layout "clas" sotto).

Si prega di notare, visto che questa domanda salta fuori spesso, che vengono prese in considerazione molte variabili come il tracktype, smoothness o surface. Se volete conoscere la chiave principale che ne regola la rappresentazione siete pregati di leggere il codice sorgente dei fogli di stile (vedi FAQ).

Main Highways "trad" layoutMain highways "clas" layout

 

I sentieri con attributi riferiti alla mtb o alla sac_scale (clicca l'immagine per ingrandire)

Ways with mtb attributes - "clas" layout

 

Linee e strade aggiuntive  (clicca l'immagine per ingrandire)

Additional ways and lines - "trad" layoutAdditonal ways and lines "clas" layout

 

Punti di Interesse

Ristoranti e Negozi

 

Sport e Turismo

 

Municipali ed altri POI

 

Aree

Uso del terreno:

 

Sport e Luoghi Pubblici:

 

Natura e Turismo

 

Abbreviazioni ed Attributi Strade:

M12 / Mr34 -- il primo numero indica il mtb:scale, il secondo numero il mtb:scale:uphill. "r" indica una strada che fa parte di una percorso mtb. Vedere:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
G1 -- tracktype=grade1 Tipo Track= Grado1 Vedere: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tracktype
S2 -- sac_scale=S2 (Escursioni in montagna) Vedere: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale

Xbk --bicycle=no Bicicletta Vietata
Cr Or Mr -- route=bicycle / route=mtb See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/relation:route

Vedere: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Pri=primary / primary_link
Sec=secondary
Ter=tertiary
Cw=cycleway
Min=minor
Unsf=unsurfaced
Uncl=unclassified
Living=living_street
Pdstrn=pedestrian
Trk=track
Pth=path
Ft=footway
Fp=footpath
Brdlw=bridleway
Rd=road
Byw=byway
Ser=service

 

Cyclelane/Cycletrack

Vedere: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Bklane=cycleway=lane
Bktrk - cycleway=track
Opp - cycleway=opposite
Opptrk - cycleway=opposite_track

 

30 comments to Legenda Mappa

  • inarav43

    Hallo Felix, da ich in der Kartenlegende nicht fündig wurde, meine Frage:
    was bedeuten die blauen Rechtecke mit weissem Pfeil und kann man diese eventuell ausblenden, da sie meiner Meinung die Ansicht erheblich beeinträchtigen. Danke und Grüße Inarav

    • extremecarver

      Ui – so ist das wirklich übel. Im Prinzip bedeuten die hier geht die Straße/Weg weiter und gehört noch gemapped. Normalerweise sieht man so Pfeile sehr selten – dass eine Gegend damit zu zugekleistert ist habe ich noch nie gesehen. Du müsstest im .typ-file mit einem typfile editor (laufen nur unter Windows, bzw am Mac/Linux via WineHD) den Pfeil zu einem einzelnen 1Pixel kleinen Punkt abändern (ganz unsichtbar klappt nicht immer – hängt vom Gerät ab).

      Ist das nur in einer Gegend so übel – oder im ganzen Land (welches Land?). Wenn das ganze Land so zugepflastert ist, könnte ich da per Regel einfach alle Pfeile entfernen – weil so macht das ja keinen Sinn.

  • Christoph Rohland

    Auf meinem Edge 800 ist das Grün der MTB Trails kaum von Schwarz zu unterscheiden. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit ein helleres Grün einzustellen?

    • extremecarver

      du müsstest das .typ File der Karte verändern – ist aber etwas komplizierter (etwa mit MapTK – das verwende ich – oder dem kostenpflichtigen TypWiz)

      • Christoph Rohland

        Ich hab den typviewer benutzt. Mit #00CA00 als Farbe für MTB tracks kann ich sie deutlich besser von normalen Tracks unterscheiden. Außerdem habe ich den Hintergrund von MTB3-5 weiß statt transparent gemacht.

  • VORON_SPb

    Hello! I’ve noticed a problem in rendering of your map in Garmin, while having some bad experience in recent Belarus cycling trip.

    Many unpaved roads in OSM have only 2 properties: highway=track & surface=unpaved. With the Openmtbmap, the Garmin device renders such road as “G2 Trk”. This is incorrect, as G2 implies “quite good road”, while in reality this road may be truly horrible (drawn across the swamp using the satellite imagery, and actually passable only on tractor or tank).

    I’d suggest putting the G* tags on road only if there are appropriate “tracktype” or “smoothness” tags, not basing only on surface=unpaved (which may mean every kind of surface in reality).

    • extremecarver

      okay- well in Western Europe that usually works quite well – and I’m not sure what other default I should chose – none also does not seem fitting. maybe display it like G3 or G4?
      For other surface tags this works more reliable – but es unpaved is very broad.

      • VORON_SPb

        I believe that such rules will make sense:
        1. highway=track -> “Trk”
        2. highway=track, surface=* -> “Trk” (except asphalt, paving_stones and concrete:plates which shall be “G1 Trk”).

        I don’t know the present rules, but obviously, if there is no tracktype or smoothness tag, any kinds of unpaved surface shall not automatically assign G* tag.

        I can give you some photos of that aerial-drawn “G2” roads, where the actual smoothness was horrible or very_horrible. 🙂

        • extremecarver

          well – I will disable it for unpaved, because it is really not very good. However I will keep some others – on velomap the tracktypes added are a bit lower – e.g. compacted gets tracktype=2 – that is because with wide enough tyres (e.g. 1.75″ and not some race tyres <1.3″) I do believe surfaces like compacted are ressembling more a tracktype=1 – however with thin tyres it is more like 2.
          At least according to the sample images given here I think that fits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
          tracktype!=* & surface=asphalt {add tracktype=1}
          tracktype!=* & surface=concrete {add tracktype=1}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=sett {add tracktype=1}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=compacted {add tracktype=1}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=dirt {add tracktype=3}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=mud {add tracktype=4}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=sand {add tracktype=4}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=earth {add tracktype=3}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=ground {add tracktype=3}
          tracktype!=* & surface=gravel {add tracktype=2}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=grass {add tracktype=4}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=pebblestone {add tracktype=2}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=grass_paver {add tracktype=3}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=paving_stones {add tracktype=1}
          mtb:scale!=* & tracktype!=* & sac_scale!=* & surface=paved {add tracktype=1}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=”dirt road” {add tracktype=2}
          mtb:scale!=* & sac_scale!=* & tracktype!=* & surface=dirt_road {add tracktype=2}

          • VORON_SPb

            I’m not fully agreed. I use the 29×2.35″ tyres, but often the compacted (in theory) surface means LOTS of sand (alternating with washboard), and that’s definitely not G1.

            See the gravel roads in Iceland (and in ex-USSR of course), they are “compacted”, but in the meantime may be difficult to pass even on MTB.

            • extremecarver

              so you would rather put them as g2 for openmtbmap, and g3 for velomap?

              • VORON_SPb

                You know, in absolute best possible case that may be G1/G2, but that’s quite rare outside the highly developed countries. In most cases that would be G2/G3. But quite often – down to G3/G4 (difficult to ride on MTB, impossible on other bikes). And in all cases that technically will be “compacted” surface.

                If you don’t look at tracktype and smoothness tags while assigning the G tag, that would be better to set G2/G3 on compacted roads and none on unpaved roads.

                • extremecarver

                  No – the rule is to only use surface if neither tracktype, smoothness nor sac_scale nor mtb:scale is available – else it’s dropped. In central Europa compacted is usually pretty good, but it’s not very common – or mostly also tracktype mapped. I will decrease it to G3 for openmtbmap and G4 for velomap.

                  • VORON_SPb

                    OK. Also the same solution (downgrading from G2/G3 to G3/G4) may be applied to gravel surface. In many cases it’s really rough and barely rideable on road bike. But unlike the compacted surface, large ponds or sand-covered areas rarely appear there.

                    But I don’t understand, why using the different G tags for the same road in Velomap and MTB Map? I thought that the track grade is absolute value, not relative. I mean that MTB can easily ride on G1-G3, and with difficulties on G4. The road bike can easily ride on G1-G2 and with difficulties on G3.

                  • extremecarver

                    why different – because in VeloMap it’s worse if you encounter worse condition than you expect due to the type of bike. Usually gravel is the typical G2 track though. But yes to keep it safe I will put it as G3 for Velomap.
                    And yes tracktype or smoothness is absolute – but how I interpret surface to tracktype is not.

                  • VORON_SPb

                    I use the OpenMTBmap for family bicycle touring. Mostly unpaved roads (thus asphalt-oriented navigation of Velomap is not suitable), 15 kgs on the front rack and handlebar, 17+ kgs my son, 5 kgs the bicycle seat. So I also don’t like finding the road worse than it was tagged on map. 🙂

  • pietbmw2

    hello
    can you tell on what scale these maps are??
    can’t really find it on the site , or don’t see it right now

    thanks
    piet

    • extremecarver

      On windows it’s at the top of the download list – on OSx they are hard to find – correct. CTRL-F “legend” – it’s listed under the europe countries maps with name legend.
      and well – scale doesn’t matter…

  • gbal

    Hi Felix.
    I find on Europe Map some Highway set as UCL. It seems to me that they correspond to UNCL (Unclassified) attribute mentioned in this document: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
    Am I right?
    Ciao

  • gbal

    follows my previous post

  • gbal

    I could add only one pict instead the declared 3.
    Then I add the other two on next posts.

  • gbal

    Hi Felix,
    have a happy new year in first.
    I’m writing about a track type you assigned to a trail that I followed with my MTB last 31/12/2016.
    The track is classified as XBK (no bicycle or prohibited bicycle) but I saw this is instead an allowed track for the MTB because this is one of the training routes of the local MTB School as you can see on the enclosed pictures.
    Just to localize the tile or zone I show also the coordinates of a summit I reached.
    Regards
    Giulio (gbal)

  • solitone

    I’ve noticed that when the value in incline tag is numeric, mtb:scale:uphill is not rendered–i.e. if incline=15% or incline=-10%, there is no indication as to the incline on the map, even if mtb:scale:uphill is set. It works when inline=up or incline=down, though.

  • solitone

    Regarding mapping paths in OSM, when a path is not allowed to bicycles but only to pedestrians, can I use “access=no, foot=yes”, or is it better to specify “access=no, bicycles=no, foot=yes”? “bicycles=no” would be redundant, as I would already have “access=no”, but what do you think?

    • extremecarver

      Well – you should only map bicycle=no if it is explicitly forbidden (by a streetsign). access=no & foot=yes would mean the same essentially – but I won’t map the crosses to tell it’s forbidden – because I assume it’s illegal but mostly tolerated to still mtb. I.e. in Austria if mtbiking is not explicitely allowed – it is forbidden everywhere – so we have to break the law if we want to mtbike.

      • solitone

        So are you telling that bicycle=no is not rendered? I put it on a path that has an explicit sign, but I don’t see anything different from all other paths on the map, as if this tag is not actually considered.

        • extremecarver

          it depends on other tags. For pathes I usually put it in name only – not on the map as crosses. I should probably change that to only not show in Gemany and Austria – but do show in other countries.

Leave a Reply